• XSS.stack #1 – первый литературный журнал от юзеров форума

How to source HQ proxies?

nosuitACE

CD-диск
Пользователь
Регистрация
18.07.2021
Сообщения
12
Реакции
1
Hello, I was a bit curious on how people can get HQ proxies for carding, such as the ones available on faceless or socks.bz (if anyone knows more sites like these, I would appreciate a link). I understand most of the time botnets are used but are there any other methods that are more available? Scraping or some alternative route to go? Thanks
 
Пожалуйста, обратите внимание, что пользователь заблокирован
Hello, I was a bit curious on how people can get HQ proxies for carding, such as the ones available on faceless or socks.bz (if anyone knows more sites like these, I would appreciate a link). I understand most of the time botnets are used but are there any other methods that are more available? Scraping or some alternative route to go? Thanks
Che Browser + Nsocks. Net = Flex
 
Best way is to make your own proxxies.
Every public proxy is garbage anyway.
In spam list.
This is what I was interested in learning how to do, I know some people aquire them with botnets, but I was curious if its possible to get good proxies from scraping, and other methods would be mich appreciated
 
This is what I was interested in learning how to do, I know some people aquire them with botnets, but I was curious if its possible to get good proxies from scraping, and other methods would be mich appreciated
Don't you think it is important to understand the fundamental operability of the subject first? And with that base logical continuation to consider what establishes criteria for risk scoring, activity reporting, and all other applied quantifications of entropy. How can it be collected (and by who, and how? keep in memory or storage? why choice one or other and dont forget the cost considerations, integration realistic? )... I mean is it really that cognitively elusive, the concept of reductive analysis? The idea that there should be anything besides a negligible difference in our ability to think and learn sounds absurd!
 
Последнее редактирование:
Don't you think it is important to understand the fundamental operability of the subject first? And with that base logical continuation to consider what establishes criteria for risk scoring, activity reporting, and all other applied quantifications of entropy. How can it be collected (and by who, and how? keep in memory or storage? why choice one or other and dont forget the cost considerations, integration realistic? )... I mean is it really that cognitively elusive, the concept of reductive analysis? The idea that there should be anything besides a negligible difference in our ability to think and learn sounds absurd!
whats the purpose of a forum like this except to accelerate learning? If everyone was going to start from scratch and not learn from each other why would a place like this even exist? I understand some of the criteria and metrics for scoring but im sure someone else here knows more than I do about some methods of obtaining such material, in which im inexperienced and unfamiliar, thanks
 
whats the purpose of a forum like this except to accelerate learning? If everyone was going to start from scratch and not learn from each other why would a place like this even exist? I understand some of the criteria and metrics for scoring but im sure someone else here knows more than I do about some methods of obtaining such material, in which im inexperienced and unfamiliar, thanks
Post those which you are familiar. That way beginners can learn from them and more experienced members can expand on it (without having to guess)
 


Напишите ответ...
  • Вставить:
Прикрепить файлы
Верх