• XSS.stack #1 – первый литературный журнал от юзеров форума

Help Setting Up Uadmin Panel

Lipshitz

(L3) cache
Пользователь
Регистрация
26.11.2021
Сообщения
221
Реакции
114
Does anyone have any information regarding writing pages for Uadmin panels? The documentation I have is very basic and just shows dependencies to install, etc.

This is what I've found so far
 
Последнее редактирование:
Hi. i can help you further.
 
Do you have the working u-admin script ? if yes I can help you write custom uadmin pages.
the working base uAdmin script is everywhere lol id try to upload it when im home


to write uadmin panels, take a day or two to read over a uadmin phishet for it. once you understand how it breaks up pages to send to victims and how to write the json config for it, it's super easy. i have a lot of fun taking shit phish kits and turning them into uadmin phishlets with a little work. just required adding a custom loading page between different pages and creating the config to load it. uadmin already parses all request_uri, so no need to add much php other than the include file really.
 
the working base uAdmin script is everywhere lol id try to upload it when im home


to write uadmin panels, take a day or two to read over a uadmin phishet for it. once you understand how it breaks up pages to send to victims and how to write the json config for it, it's super easy. i have a lot of fun taking shit phish kits and turning them into uadmin phishlets with a little work. just required adding a custom loading page between different pages and creating the config to load it. uadmin already parses all request_uri, so no need to add much php other than the include file really.
Uadmin is shit. i would better go for evilgenx
 
Uadmin is shit. i would better go for evilgenx
depends what your ultimate goal is, saying reverse proxies are better is pretty useless and a little naive. with static phishlets, you can phish for specific 2fa docs like id/password photos, pins and other info that you wouldn't be able to with evilginx without extensive work. phishing kits are good for some things, reverse proxies are good for others. you use whatever is best for your engagement :)

on a side note, uadmin was and still is a very well coded and advanced cms for developing unique live phishlets around. you should take the opportunity to look through the code and see for yourself
 
depends what your ultimate goal is, saying reverse proxies are better is pretty useless and a little naive. with static phishlets, you can phish for specific 2fa docs like id/password photos, pins and other info that you wouldn't be able to with evilginx without extensive work. phishing kits are good for some things, reverse proxies are good for others. you use whatever is best for your engagement :)

on a side note, uadmin was and still is a very well coded and advanced cms for developing unique live phishlets around. you should take the opportunity to look through the code and see for yourself
i do understand but if it is a basic phishlet then it's fine else you have to go for reverse proxies.

one more thing uadmin has a critical vulnerability :)

so either you fix it or you bear it 🤣
 
i do understand but if it is a basic phishlet then it's fine else you have to go for reverse proxies.

one more thing uadmin has a critical vulnerability :)

so either you fix it or you bear it 🤣
that sqli was fixed in a later version, all it requires is to sanitize $_GET['link'] in the download.php file. mysql_real_escape_string($conn, $link) fixes that. the fact that people started fuzzing the kit at all should speak as to how popular and important it was for its time.

what is a basic phishet? do you mean those hackforums single file kits where there's always a crappy antibot working off of static ips? uadmin is far from this. done right, it can be very effective at taking on unique phishing campaigns.

i agree that stealing session cookies is more useful when phishing the actual site, but sometimes you want to get them to enter a pin to a service that's not common, or request file uploads and the real site doesn't have any page to proxify for it. different tools for different jobs, just as there is no best programming language, only the language that best fits the job description.
 
Последнее редактирование:
that sqli was fixed in a later version, all it requires is to sanitize $_GET['link'] in the download.php file. mysql_real_escape_string($conn, $link) fixes that. the fact that people started fuzzing the kit at all should speak as to how popular and important it was for its time.

what is a basic phishet? do you mean those hackforums single file kits where there's always a crappy antibot working off of static ips? uadmin is far from this. done right, it can be very effective at taking on unique phishing campaigns.

i agree that stealing session cookies is more useful when phishing the actual site, but sometimes you want to get them to enter a pin to a service that's not common, or request file uploads and the real site doesn't have any page to proxify for it. different tools for different jobs, just as there is no best programming language, only the language that best fits the job description.
agreed but i was talking about the extendibility in current time bro
 
agreed but i was talking about the extendibility in current time bro

That's the point is uadmin is easily extensible while evilginx isn't. Not to argue further, each use case has it's it's own combination of tools that would be best fit
 


Напишите ответ...
  • Вставить:
Прикрепить файлы
Верх