i was looking at some articles, and i ended up watching a video of mental outlaw talking about TOR nodes, and i'm wondering how secure you think tor can be and if you think tor can become insecure (or more insecure) over time?
This one, is an interesting article with some recommendations in the end https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/n...ed-by-law-enforcement-is-it-still-safe-to-usei was looking at some articles, and i ended up watching a video of mental outlaw talking about TOR nodes, and i'm wondering how secure you think tor can be and if you think tor can become insecure (or more insecure) over time?
much more than that, I personally owned more than 5% of all Tor nodes having a very limited budget and possibilities, compared to those of FBI or other 3 letter agencies.what are chance of encountering 2 malicious nodes ? Lets assume is 5% ( altough I am pretty sure is more ).
you reminded me of that USDoD case, it was doxxed because of osint, after that case I was thinking, how can someone let these serious opsec flaws pass?Also, do not forget that your forum account here is your fingerprint. Your nickname is your fingerprint. All your jabbers, tox-ids are your fingerprints. The way you communicate is your fingerprint. Your personality is your fingerprint. Take every big cybercriminal case during last decade and it was not about compromising Tor-node but about the most retarded OpSec fails and about people talking crazy shit here and there and on each other. Discipline, moderation and stong principles (at least of what NOT to do) will help your OpSec more than conspiracy videos about whom all tor-nodes belong too.
wow, tell me what it was like to have at least that 5%?much more than that, I personally owned more than 5% of all Tor nodes having a very limited budget and possibilities compared to those of FBI or other 3 letter agencies.
so I am pretty sure that at least 50% nodes are malicious and think that the real number could be more than 75%
nothing specialwhat it was like to have at least that 5%?
I had up to 10% of all network bandwidth. it seems that many Tor nodes are (were) hosted on slow connections and my 5-10 Mbps per node was much above average.Did you see a lot of traffic passing through?
The reason why QubeOS is not popular is because it's difficult to setup and use. most of the times things dont work and it takes longer to fix them than to do the actual work. It's the most secure because it physically doesn't allow you to work (do crime).you reminded me of that USDoD case, it was doxxed because of osint, after that case I was thinking, how can someone let these serious opsec flaws pass?
he literally used the same phrase in his personal instagram bio on twitter, that was too crazy for me (dumb to me)
about QubeOS, it really is great, it was even recommended and praised by Edward Snowden, and yet I don't see many people not using it.
Also, do not forget that your forum account here is your fingerprint. Your nickname is your fingerprint. All your jabbers, tox-ids are your fingerprints. The way you communicate is your fingerprint. Your personality is your fingerprint. Take every big cybercriminal case during last decade and it was not about compromising Tor-node but about the most retarded OpSec fails and about people talking crazy shit here and there and on each other. Discipline, moderation and stong principles (at least of what NOT to do) will help your OpSec more than conspiracy videos about whom all tor-nodes belong too.
A better way to analyze this would be to split it into 3 parts:You also should always remember that Tor was designed by the U.S. Dept. of the Navy.
Qubes is probably the most secure OS, but it comes with a fairly steep learning curve that intimidates people. As bratva said, it rarely is your OS or TOR that gets you caught.you reminded me of that USDoD case, it was doxxed because of osint, after that case I was thinking, how can someone let these serious opsec flaws pass?
he literally used the same phrase in his personal instagram bio on twitter, that was too crazy for me (dumb to me)
about QubeOS, it really is great, it was even recommended and praised by Edward Snowden, and yet I don't see many people not using it.
Qubes is probably the most secure OS
Do you agree that Qubes and OpenBSD are two different things? At its core, Qubes is a VM management infrastructure based on the Xen hypervisor. You can make an OpenBSD Qube.There are so many incorrect, noobish, half knowledge, zero knowledge, irrational, embarrassingly (second hand) idiotic statements in this thread, specifically around crap like Qubes, Tails. If you are a journalist or a person of interest with no technical skills, you would have no choice than to go with such dog crap.
I will say one thing though: Noobs, stop jerking off to Tails, Qubes, Snowden, Mental Outlaw, YouTube channels and rather study something technical, pick a textbook, open the code editor. Come back to this thread a year later and laugh at the stupid ass crap you've written. You would know what I'm talking about then.
Young padawan, you have much to learn.)Do you agree that Qubes and OpenBSD are two different things? At its core, Qubes is a VM management infrastructure based on the Xen hypervisor. You can make an OpenBSD Qube.
In the end, if your OpenBSD is compromised, they have everything. If your OpenBSD Qube is compromised, they own that Qube. As far as I understand, that is the idea behind their compartamentalization.
Is not hard to use. It is more complicated then the average Linux distro, but if you already have experiance with using Debian and/or Fedora ( depends which template you want to use ), and you have some knowledge of virtual machines is more smooth.The reason why QubeOS is not popular is because it's difficult to setup and use. most of the times things dont work and it takes longer to fix them than to do the actual work. It's the most secure because it physically doesn't allow you to work (do crime).
i was looking at some articles, and i ended up watching a video of mental outlaw talking about TOR nodes, and i'm wondering how secure you think tor can be and if you think tor can become insecure (or more insecure) over time?