regarding authors + translators

[shrekushka]

#1 (Пишем свой брутфорс. Руководство для начинающих) - Dec 31, 2023
---
/threads/104897/
Source: user_agent = random.choice(['Mozilla/5.0', 'Chrome/83.0.1'])
PAID

#2 (Детальный разбор xss уязвимостей) - Jan 1, 2024
---
/threads/104943/
Source: stumejournals.com/journals/confsec/2019/4/pdf
mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3787
PAID

#3 (Разбираемся в SQL и CSRF уязвимостях на практике) - Jan 2, 2024
---
/threads/104968/
Source:
PAID

#4 (Path traversal attack) - Jan 5, 2024
---
/threads/105103/
Source: research.cs.wisc.edu/mist/SoftwareSecurityCourse/Chapters/3_3-Directory-Traversal.pdf
PAID

#5 (Хакаем darkboys666 или раскручиваем Local File Inclusion до Remote Code Execution) - Jan 6, 2024
---
/threads/105230/
Source: blog.injectexp.dev/unwind-local-file-inclusion-before-remote-code-execution/02/rce/
PAID

#6 (Пентестим веб сайт на joomla. Детальная статья) - Jan 9, 2024
---
/threads/105379/
Source:
PAID

#7 (вебсайты с помощи sql инъекции. Практическое руководство) - Jan 12, 2024
---
/threads/105666/
Source:
PAID

#8 (Как Используется ChatGPT в кибербезопасности) - Jan 17, 2024
---
/threads/106032/
Source: ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=10198233
PAYMENT REJECTED

#9 (Секреты безопасных веб приложений на JavaScript. Гайд для новичков) - Jan 22, 2024
---
/threads/106419/
Source: PAYMENT REJECTED

#10 (Практика создания веб-сканера уязвимостей на примере сканера из [ // XSSware]) - Mar 24, 2024
---
/threads/111226/
Source:
PAID

#11 (Ресерч на комплексную тему: SECaaS когда безопасность становится умной. Как ИИ защищает данные в облачную эпоху) - Jul 14, 2024
---
/threads/118872/
Source:
PAYMENT REJECTED

#12 (Fileless атаки как смысл жизни: подробный разбор) - Jul 25, 2024
---
/threads/119583/
Source:
PAID

#13 (Кушаем APT на завтрак — раскрываем все аспекты, векторы атак и многое другое) - Jul 27, 2024
---
/threads/119682/
Source: plurilock.com/deep-dive/advanced-persistent-threat-apt/
techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/advanced-persistent-threat-APT
PAYMENT REJECTED

#14 (Понедельник — день тяжелый. Разбираем все техники СИ) - Jul 28, 2024
---
/threads/119729/
Source:
PAYMENT REJECTED

#15 (Well, well, well. Обижаем ИИ разными способами) - Aug 9, 2024
---
/threads/120503/
Source:
PAID

#16 (Когда ИИ забывает, кто здесь главный) - Aug 9, 2024
---
/threads/120893/
Source:
PAID

#16 (Как создать идеального советчика по технологиям: Веб-приложение с ИИ, которое не требует кофеина!)
---
/threads/121060/
Source:
PAID

#17 (От новичка до код-гения: Создаём ИИ-ассистента для тренировок и не скучаем)
---
/threads/121163/
Source:
PAID


Good afternoon, I didnot write a detailed judgement on the substance of the articles but purely I allotted myself 2 min for each article with basic plagiarism checkers. most of the article is generic (no useful actual technical details) newspaper style articles copy pasted from news sites, wikipedia, research paper abstracts and first introduction section paragraphs, generated/modified by a neural network, fileless malware written in python, writing a Gemini LLM API wrapper, APT, EDR, XDR, NGAV, horses in a vacuum etc. Of course, no one hates writers who organize, translate, collect, discuss interesting articles from other sources but this is not very good to not cite original authors and even more to ask for a payment from the admin. This doesn't mean the requirement for an article is fuzzing for an unpatched dos use after free in ffmpeg. But there are already lots of other interesting articles/discussions/questions here already.

The author should continue writing, it is great for the writer to study and for the forum, but cite the original authors with links + don't write what is just research paper introduction garbage, horses in a vacuum, don't even write topics on creating flask routes, interaction with llm api. Don't just explain each line of code, each parameter to the function, or even blocks of code, how to parse command line args, or how to convert byte endianness. I suggest the author to study the threads on the forum, read textbooks (not newspaper websites), and ask/answer questions, practice first rather than writing articles. This applies to pure translators as well. Then regarding money, it flies to you slowly, but this will not even be from the articles then)

And this topic brings the discussion of raising the bar for article entries. But that is not the original intention I started this topic with. The is a message in general for the authors) thank you

 

[shrekushka]

threads/121208/

hackeryaroslav, I am tagging you. Again the same "how to write your first Flask endpoint", there is nothing new here. The same beginner Flask endpoint writing again and again which is found easily on the internet, and most importantly how is this even relevant to the forum's theme of hacking? You are lucky that the administrator of the forum is polite and offered you money for the article and has been doing it. How much did you earn so far? 1000$? 2000$? Is that from one account yourself? Do you have multiple accounts putting likes and comments on to your articles? Do you also write articles from other accounts? Do you make a weekly/monthly schedule with goals to write 4 articles a month with 10k characters each so you can make 300$ a month minimum? How many people read, benefit from your articles according to you? Do you think you are doing meaningful work?

Sorry for being harsh but this is completely shameless. Everyone appreciates the writing but you cannot simply ask payment.
1. The article is very beginner, its a simple Flask endpoint, basic user registration, admin/moderator rights, ask/answer questions, Flask-login. The same theory and practice is applied more than ten thousand times online and in Russian as well and is very easy to find. It's the first thing many people try to do after studying Flask. Every schoolchildren who finished the bootcamp is aware of this.
2. The article is not related to the forum's theme in anyway.
3. You cannot ask for payments for such articles.
4. If it's not for money, then keep writing if you truly enjoy sharing information with the forum. But it seems to me you don't care about feedback on your articles from what I observe. There are no questions asked, no comments other than 'Top, top article. Best. Cool.', and likes from many accounts who never write anything on the forum. With all this being said, the only thing that could logically motivate you to write articles must be 150$ for each article from admin's pocket, am I right? hackeryaroslav

admin please raise the standards strictly. I understand there was a loss of money due to BTC fluctuations for the last competition, and you had to put money out of pocket into the money pool. If the standards are strictly raised:
1. Money won't be burned on Flask tutorials, AI malware (there are lots of interesting topics in AI attacks, but how to use chatgpt REST API is not hacking), APT Social Engineering HTML Malware Exploits, backdooring blockchain with rainbow tables.
2. People cannot exploit the vulnerability of infinite money glitch in the article writing. Find a gitub repo with 2 stars, or blog with no traffic and throw into chatgpt and modify code into heavy OOPS encapsulation, variable name changes, "GPT, please refactor the blog so the admin of XSS will not catch me plagiarizing" etc shit and vomit here on to the forum.

PS. I posted on the main thread so it receives some amount of attention, if this not the place, sorry. You can move to the original threads/121208/

 

[hackeryaroslav]

threads/121208/

hackeryaroslav, I am tagging you. Again the same "how to write your first Flask endpoint", there is nothing new here. The same beginner Flask endpoint writing again and again which is found easily on the internet, and most importantly how is this even relevant to the forum's theme of hacking? You are lucky that the administrator of the forum is polite and offered you money for the article and has been doing it. How much did you earn so far? 1000$? 2000$? Is that from one account yourself? Do you have multiple accounts putting likes and comments on to your articles? Do you also write articles from other accounts? Do you make a weekly/monthly schedule with goals to write 4 articles a month with 10k characters each so you can make 300$ a month minimum? How many people read, benefit from your articles according to you? Do you think you are doing meaningful work?

Sorry for being harsh but this is completely shameless. Everyone appreciates the writing but you cannot simply ask payment.
1. The article is very beginner, its a simple Flask endpoint, basic user registration, admin/moderator rights, ask/answer questions, Flask-login. The same theory and practice is applied more than ten thousand times online and in Russian as well and is very easy to find. It's the first thing many people try to do after studying Flask. Every schoolchildren who finished the bootcamp is aware of this.
2. The article is not related to the forum's theme in anyway.
3. You cannot ask for payments for such articles.
4. If it's not for money, then keep writing if you truly enjoy sharing information with the forum. But it seems to me you don't care about feedback on your articles from what I observe. There are no questions asked, no comments other than 'Top, top article. Best. Cool.', and likes from many accounts who never write anything on the forum. With all this being said, the only thing that could logically motivate you to write articles must be 150$ for each article from admin's pocket, am I right? hackeryaroslav

admin please raise the standards strictly. I understand there was a loss of money due to BTC fluctuations for the last competition, and you had to put money out of pocket into the money pool. If the standards are strictly raised:
1. Money won't be burned on Flask tutorials, AI malware (there are lots of interesting topics in AI attacks, but how to use chatgpt REST API is not hacking), APT Social Engineering HTML Malware Exploits, backdooring blockchain with rainbow tables.
2. People cannot exploit the vulnerability of infinite money glitch in the article writing. Find a gitub repo with 2 stars, or blog with no traffic and throw into chatgpt and modify code into heavy OOPS encapsulation, variable name changes, "GPT, please refactor the blog so the admin of XSS will not catch me plagiarizing" etc shit and vomit here on to the forum.

PS. I posted on the main thread so it receives some amount of attention, if this not the place, sorry. You can move to the original threads/121208/

да уж, не думал, что какой-то новорег вывалит такую откровенную херню. Во-первых, мои проекты далеко не начального уровня, их сложность — на среднем уровне. Во-вторых, я не вижу твоих четких стандартов. Ты ноешь, что моя статья проста, но это веб-тематика и ИИ, тут нет ничего сложного. Заявляешь, что моя статья не уникальна и это плагиат, который легко гуглится? Так почему не привел ссылки или код, чтобы доказать свои слова? Тебя так бомбит от того, что я выпускаю пару статей в месяц? Мои статьи соответствуют требованиям для оплаты, не все из них были приняты, и это обсуждалось с админом. Он объяснил, как нужно делать, и я это учел.Забавная ситуация. У тебя не бомбит, когда люди пишут о калькуляторах или простых тг-ботах, которые показывают курс BTC, но почему-то моих статей ты терпеть не можешь. Похоже, главная причина — это то, что мои статьи оплачиваются. В принципе, мне плевать на тебя. Когда дочитал твое дерьмо, у меня только улыбка на лице появилась. В итоге ты полил грязью, разорвался на тему, что написание статей может быть дополнительным источником заработка, но сам ничего по качеству статьи предъявить не смог. Напоследок: напиши свою статью сюда, на хсс, и посмотрим, чего ты на самом деле стоишь.

 

[shrekushka]

да уж, не думал, что какой-то новорег вывалит такую откровенную херню.

Seriously? No time deadline to reply and that is your first rational argument you come with to my comments? Let's change the scenario a bit, and this was asked by a 10 year user with reputation unlike me obviously. How would your reply's opening statements be then? The comments I made were mostly rational.

Во-первых, мои проекты далеко не начального уровня, их сложность — на среднем уровне.

How is the flask endpoint, SQLi, CSRF medium level in anyway? If you go to any university on the planet, this is what happens in the first few terms in the universities for almost more than two decades or in the online bootcamps. No one serious calls them medium level, bro. This is a fact I'm not willing to defend.

Во-вторых, я не вижу твоих четких стандартов. Ты ноешь, что моя статья проста, но это веб-тематика и ИИ, тут нет ничего сложного.

Exactly! the topic is not related to theme of the forum. Of course you can write all kinds of unrelated topics but why ask for a payment?

Заявляешь, что моя статья не уникальна и это плагиат, который легко гуглится? Так почему не привел ссылки или код, чтобы доказать свои слова?

I already found each act of plagiarism in strictly 2 mins, others I didn't find. But any person with a sane mind wouldn't read and not think the articles are AI generated or copied or research paper introduction section style garbage.

Спойлер

#1 (Пишем свой брутфорс. Руководство для начинающих) - Dec 31, 2023
---
/threads/104897/
Source: user_agent = random.choice(['Mozilla/5.0', 'Chrome/83.0.1'])
PAID

#2 (Детальный разбор xss уязвимостей) - Jan 1, 2024
---
/threads/104943/
Source: stumejournals.com/journals/confsec/2019/4/pdf
mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3787
PAID

#3 (Разбираемся в SQL и CSRF уязвимостях на практике) - Jan 2, 2024
---
/threads/104968/
Source:
PAID

#4 (Path traversal attack) - Jan 5, 2024
---
/threads/105103/
Source: research.cs.wisc.edu/mist/SoftwareSecurityCourse/Chapters/3_3-Directory-Traversal.pdf
PAID

#5 (Хакаем darkboys666 или раскручиваем Local File Inclusion до Remote Code Execution) - Jan 6, 2024
---
/threads/105230/
Source: blog.injectexp.dev/unwind-local-file-inclusion-before-remote-code-execution/02/rce/
PAID

#6 (Пентестим веб сайт на joomla. Детальная статья) - Jan 9, 2024
---
/threads/105379/
Source:
PAID

#7 (вебсайты с помощи sql инъекции. Практическое руководство) - Jan 12, 2024
---
/threads/105666/
Source:
PAID

#8 (Как Используется ChatGPT в кибербезопасности) - Jan 17, 2024
---
/threads/106032/
Source: ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=10198233
PAYMENT REJECTED

#9 (Секреты безопасных веб приложений на JavaScript. Гайд для новичков) - Jan 22, 2024
---
/threads/106419/
Source: PAYMENT REJECTED

#10 (Практика создания веб-сканера уязвимостей на примере сканера из [ // XSSware]) - Mar 24, 2024
---
/threads/111226/
Source:
PAID

#11 (Ресерч на комплексную тему: SECaaS когда безопасность становится умной. Как ИИ защищает данные в облачную эпоху) - Jul 14, 2024
---
/threads/118872/
Source:
PAYMENT REJECTED

#12 (Fileless атаки как смысл жизни: подробный разбор) - Jul 25, 2024
---
/threads/119583/
Source:
PAID

#13 (Кушаем APT на завтрак — раскрываем все аспекты, векторы атак и многое другое) - Jul 27, 2024
---
/threads/119682/
Source: plurilock.com/deep-dive/advanced-persistent-threat-apt/
techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/advanced-persistent-threat-APT
PAYMENT REJECTED

#14 (Понедельник — день тяжелый. Разбираем все техники СИ) - Jul 28, 2024
---
/threads/119729/
Source:
PAYMENT REJECTED

#15 (Well, well, well. Обижаем ИИ разными способами) - Aug 9, 2024
---
/threads/120503/
Source:
PAID

#16 (Когда ИИ забывает, кто здесь главный) - Aug 9, 2024
---
/threads/120893/
Source:
PAID

#16 (Как создать идеального советчика по технологиям: Веб-приложение с ИИ, которое не требует кофеина!)
---
/threads/121060/
Source:
PAID

#17 (От новичка до код-гения: Создаём ИИ-ассистента для тренировок и не скучаем)
---
/threads/121163/
Source:
PAID

Тебя так бомбит от того, что я выпускаю пару статей в месяц?

Of course not, but as you can see above there is a pattern, a money hungry pattern in the timelines and the type of garbage you unloaded on to the forum.

Мои статьи соответствуют требованиям для оплаты, не все из них были приняты, и это обсуждалось с админом. Он объяснил, как нужно делать, и я это учел.

The argument is flawed. The admin even failed to identify the plagiarized content sometimes you shamelessly stole without credit and even more shamelessly asked for a payment. The admin paid. What's your face in front of him and the whole forum now? No shame? Don't spit in the well that you drink from.

У тебя не бомбит, когда люди пишут о калькуляторах или простых тг-ботах, которые показывают курс BTC, но почему-то моих статей ты терпеть не можешь. Похоже, главная причина — это то, что мои статьи оплачиваются

I found you to be the perfect example who has high amounts of articles to analyze. So called serial killers. It would be perfect to make a case out of you. It's already obvious from my statements that I used you as an example because you are a serial killer (a serial article writer). Perhaps you have made millions out of the forum, so it's always interesting to study the best example. Of course there are people that are like you, willing to be you, want to be as successful as you in reaching 300$ every month but I used your articles as a perfect, best example. If you already know these people, then point them out. Especially if they asked for a payment. There's no point in flooding the forum with basic stuff that's repeated everywhere on the clearnet.


Read this: threads/121208/

В принципе, мне плевать на тебя. Когда дочитал твое дерьмо, у меня только улыбка на лице появилась. В итоге ты полил грязью, разорвался на тему, что написание статей может быть дополнительным источником заработка, но сам ничего по качеству статьи предъявить не смог. Напоследок: напиши свою статью сюда, на хсс, и посмотрим, чего ты на самом деле стоишь.

This is the only fair point (still doesn't address your case your case, escape hatch from the criticism I made?) you make but with insults instead of an actual criticism. So you want me to write an article? So articles only qualified if a post has the green article tag and images? Yes, I am new here but I wrote something at least. I don't care if a topic is an article according to the laws of the forum, I just came here to learn and share what I have. But if this is a challenge, then great, it will be fun, perhaps reversing, fuzzing? I am busy right now, I don't have ten hours off everyday to write articles in a serial killer fashion. I used to write blogs on github pages when it was first released, that was when you just hatched and even before on that on blogspot, I doubt you even know what that means, its out of your generation, son. I am your daddy. Sit on my lap. "/sbin/init" - Конор Макгрегор youtube.com/watch?v=YezMl2zi5Gs

Joke. Moderators, I read the rules, please don't give me a warning. I use it with my interns every week. Our HR, she is fine with it)

Joke. Moderators, I read the rules, please don't give me a warning. I use it with my interns every week. Our HR, she is fine with it)

And regarding my contribution, yes I have many interesting things to share but one thing I know from experience it's difficult to write a quality blog post even on the most simple topics and sometimes even boring to write in a clear fashion explaining, I don't care what you mean article is, for me, its about sharing interesting things, what I learned, what I don't know. So according to you, I can't criticize you? Since I don't have an article with a green tag? I will try to learn, share something I know whenever I visit the forum but it won't be for the purposing increasing my articles count to impress the girls or purely to grab money.

hackeryaroslav, enough of the jokes, insults, Conor made me smile. I made my point clear in three posts. I won't be battling you with verbal words.

PS. don't explain what each line of code does, just explain the idea, technical details. Don't explain each and every line, argument, each SQL query, structure. There are many good articles to read from. Why don't you stop writing articles for a month and start reading the good articles? I myself am not familiar with many topics for example: v8, chakra internals, there is light knowledge on the surface of these engines and read some articles but nothing more. And web is not even my area of expertise at all. I am reading. There are lots of articles, links, references, discussions, black hat, usenix papers etc here on the forum. I am reading. Reading and implementing a poc personally takes time. Sometimes even building the test env is itself painful in my field.)

PPS. Anyway the point is read the people you consider to be 'top', and try to understand the standards for a good, meaningful contriibution to the forum. It doesn't have to have a green label 'Article' attached to the thread post. Just write something interesting where you will receive compliments, criticism, questions, more smarter people than you showing better solutions etc.
And regarding payment, I am not the decision maker, the admin is. But it's obvious at this point to everybody perhaps yourself as well that the standards need to be raised significantly higher. Battling plagiarism is just one part of this. The standards the other.

PPPS. Give credit to original authors where its due)


Edit: PPPPS. admin please don't delete the discussion) maybe you can later move it to threads/121208/ if it disturbs the thread

 

[hackeryaroslav]

Seriously? No time deadline to reply and that is your first rational argument you come with to my comments? Let's change the scenario a bit, and this was asked by a 10 year user with reputation unlike me obviously. How would your reply's opening statements be then? The comments I made were mostly rational.



How is the flask endpoint, SQLi, CSRF medium level in anyway? If you go to any university on the planet, this is what happens in the first few terms in the universities for almost more than two decades or in the online bootcamps. No one serious calls them medium level, bro. This is a fact I'm not willing to defend.



Exactly! the topic is not related to theme of the forum. Of course you can write all kinds of unrelated topics but why ask for a payment?


I already found each act of plagiarism in strictly 2 mins, others I didn't find. But any person with a sane mind wouldn't read and not think the articles are AI generated or copied or research paper introduction section style garbage.

Спойлер

#1 (Пишем свой брутфорс. Руководство для начинающих) - Dec 31, 2023
---
/threads/104897/
Source: user_agent = random.choice(['Mozilla/5.0', 'Chrome/83.0.1'])
PAID

#2 (Детальный разбор xss уязвимостей) - Jan 1, 2024
---
/threads/104943/
Source: stumejournals.com/journals/confsec/2019/4/pdf
mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3787
PAID

#3 (Разбираемся в SQL и CSRF уязвимостях на практике) - Jan 2, 2024
---
/threads/104968/
Source:
PAID

#4 (Path traversal attack) - Jan 5, 2024
---
/threads/105103/
Source: research.cs.wisc.edu/mist/SoftwareSecurityCourse/Chapters/3_3-Directory-Traversal.pdf
PAID

#5 (Хакаем darkboys666 или раскручиваем Local File Inclusion до Remote Code Execution) - Jan 6, 2024
---
/threads/105230/
Source: blog.injectexp.dev/unwind-local-file-inclusion-before-remote-code-execution/02/rce/
PAID

#6 (Пентестим веб сайт на joomla. Детальная статья) - Jan 9, 2024
---
/threads/105379/
Source:
PAID

#7 (вебсайты с помощи sql инъекции. Практическое руководство) - Jan 12, 2024
---
/threads/105666/
Source:
PAID

#8 (Как Используется ChatGPT в кибербезопасности) - Jan 17, 2024
---
/threads/106032/
Source: ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=10198233
PAYMENT REJECTED

#9 (Секреты безопасных веб приложений на JavaScript. Гайд для новичков) - Jan 22, 2024
---
/threads/106419/
Source: PAYMENT REJECTED

#10 (Практика создания веб-сканера уязвимостей на примере сканера из [ // XSSware]) - Mar 24, 2024
---
/threads/111226/
Source:
PAID

#11 (Ресерч на комплексную тему: SECaaS когда безопасность становится умной. Как ИИ защищает данные в облачную эпоху) - Jul 14, 2024
---
/threads/118872/
Source:
PAYMENT REJECTED

#12 (Fileless атаки как смысл жизни: подробный разбор) - Jul 25, 2024
---
/threads/119583/
Source:
PAID

#13 (Кушаем APT на завтрак — раскрываем все аспекты, векторы атак и многое другое) - Jul 27, 2024
---
/threads/119682/
Source: plurilock.com/deep-dive/advanced-persistent-threat-apt/
techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/advanced-persistent-threat-APT
PAYMENT REJECTED

#14 (Понедельник — день тяжелый. Разбираем все техники СИ) - Jul 28, 2024
---
/threads/119729/
Source:
PAYMENT REJECTED

#15 (Well, well, well. Обижаем ИИ разными способами) - Aug 9, 2024
---
/threads/120503/
Source:
PAID

#16 (Когда ИИ забывает, кто здесь главный) - Aug 9, 2024
---
/threads/120893/
Source:
PAID

#16 (Как создать идеального советчика по технологиям: Веб-приложение с ИИ, которое не требует кофеина!)
---
/threads/121060/
Source:
PAID

#17 (От новичка до код-гения: Создаём ИИ-ассистента для тренировок и не скучаем)
---
/threads/121163/
Source:
PAID

Of course not, but as you can see above there is a pattern, a money hungry pattern in the timelines and the type of garbage you unloaded on to the forum.


The argument is flawed. The admin even failed to identify the plagiarized content sometimes you shamelessly stole without credit and even more shamelessly asked for a payment. The admin paid. What's your face in front of him and the whole forum now? No shame? Don't spit in the well that you drink from.


I found you to be the perfect example who has high amounts of articles to analyze. So called serial killers. It would be perfect to make a case out of you. It's already obvious from my statements that I used you as an example because you are a serial killer (a serial article writer). Perhaps you have made millions out of the forum, so it's always interesting to study the best example. Of course there are people that are like you, willing to be you, want to be as successful as you in reaching 300$ every month but I used your articles as a perfect, best example. If you already know these people, then point them out. Especially if they asked for a payment. There's no point in flooding the forum with basic stuff that's repeated everywhere on the clearnet.


Read this: threads/121208/


This is the only fair point (still doesn't address your case your case, escape hatch from the criticism I made?) you make but with insults instead of an actual criticism. So you want me to write an article? So articles only qualified if a post has the green article tag and images? Yes, I am new here but I wrote something at least. I don't care if a topic is an article according to the laws of the forum, I just came here to learn and share what I have. But if this is a challenge, then great, it will be fun, perhaps reversing, fuzzing? I am busy right now, I don't have ten hours off everyday to write articles in a serial killer fashion. I used to write blogs on github pages when it was first released, that was when you just hatched and even before on that on blogspot, I doubt you even know what that means, its out of your generation, son. I am your daddy. Sit on my lap. "/sbin/init" - Конор Макгрегор youtube.com/watch?v=YezMl2zi5Gs

Joke. Moderators, I read the rules, please don't give me a warning. I use it with my interns every week. Our HR, she is fine with it)
Посмотреть вложение 93693
Посмотреть вложение 93694
Joke. Moderators, I read the rules, please don't give me a warning. I use it with my interns every week. Our HR, she is fine with it)

And regarding my contribution, yes I have many interesting things to share but one thing I know from experience it's difficult to write a quality blog post even on the most simple topics and sometimes even boring to write in a clear fashion explaining, I don't care what you mean article is, for me, its about sharing interesting things, what I learned, what I don't know. So according to you, I can't criticize you? Since I don't have an article with a green tag? I will try to learn, share something I know whenever I visit the forum but it won't be for the purposing increasing my articles count to impress the girls or purely to grab money.

hackeryaroslav, enough of the jokes, insults, Conor made me smile. I made my point clear in three posts. I won't be battling you with verbal words.

PS. don't explain what each line of code does, just explain the idea, technical details. Don't explain each and every line, argument, each SQL query, structure. There are many good articles to read from. Why don't you stop writing articles for a month and start reading the good articles? I myself am not familiar with many topics for example: v8, chakra internals, there is light knowledge on the surface of these engines and read some articles but nothing more. And web is not even my area of expertise at all. I am reading. There are lots of articles, links, references, discussions, black hat, usenix papers etc here on the forum. I am reading. Reading and implementing a poc personally takes time. Sometimes even building the test env is itself painful in my field.)

PPS. Anyway the point is read the people you consider to be 'top', and try to understand the standards for a good, meaningful contriibution to the forum. It doesn't have to have a green label 'Article' attached to the thread post. Just write something interesting where you will receive compliments, criticism, questions, more smarter people than you showing better solutions etc.
And regarding payment, I am not the decision maker, the admin is. But it's obvious at this point to everybody perhaps yourself as well that the standards need to be raised significantly higher. Battling plagiarism is just one part of this. The standards the other.

PPPS. Give credit to original authors where its due)


Edit: PPPPS. admin please don't delete the discussion) maybe you can later move it to threads/121208/ if it disturbs the thread

если есть вопросы к моим статьям, пиши в личку))) когда я только начинал писать статьи я браузил интернет в поиске материала, но добавлял свой опыт и примеры. Частично признаю. Сейчас, я не ворую код и материалы из интернета, только свой личный опыт, ведь что старики, что админ больше признают такой контент. Такие статьи были оплачены, но я думаю это было добрым жестом и намеком админом, когда мне ясно написали без намеков, я понял свои ошибки, деньги мне помогли подняться и найти другие способы заработка. Я взял перерыв и погрузился в работу. Сейчас, я вернулся, когда свободное время есть пишу статьи, причем очень качественные. Код и материал полностью уникальны. Это ты можешь сам проверить, зайди в раздел ИИ. Хочу также добавить, что по твоим словам это не тема форума, тебе надо что нибудь "криминальное", но это не так. Разделы веб разработка и ИИ могут быть использованы как и в белых, так и в черных целях. Я думаю, мои и другие статьи не должны призывать брать черную сторону, люди могу использовать как сами хотят. Большинство статьей оплачиваются если они проходят пункт, который админ мне озвучил в лс - главное, чтобы обычный читатель, даже без опыта смог взять код и у себя запустить, что-то самому прочувствовать.


Еще раз повторюсь, я иногда возвращаюсь к своим старым статьям и они выглядят ужасно, и не всегда уникальными, те времена прошли, мне дали по жопе и я понял свои ошибки, за которые мне даже стыдно. Я до этого не имел опыта и на форуме не был так долго. Сейчас все поменялась, мои статьи стали намного лучше и на обычную статьи не спеша у меня занимает 2-3 дня, вместо пары часов когда это было в первые разы))). Я думаю ты понял мои мысли, пусть они сейчас не набирают "лайки" и "фидбеки", что не главные показатель, самое главное они вносят капельку больше знаний, который этот форум предлагает.


Ps: я не делаю миллионы на этом форуме, по твоим словам, со статьей я заработал здесь меньше чем 1000$ за все время. Мой основной источник заработка - инвестиции и трейдинг, статьи помогают мне писать интересные проекты, объяснить тому кому это будет полезно и получить копейку

 

[rand]

Сейчас все поменялась, мои статьи стали намного лучше и на обычную статьи не спеша у меня занимает 2-3 дня, вместо пары часов когда это было в первые разы))).

У тебя хорошие статьи, из последнего что я читал. Не распинайся перед новорегом, у него скорее всего осеннее обострение или самоутверждается таким способом. Таких правильных нулей на одном месте крутить надо, одному новость модера не понравилась и он тут целую драму на весь форум раскрутил, другой статьи критикует ничего толкового не написав за свои 6 сообщений.

I used to write blogs on github pages when it was first released

Давай уже без прелюдий, покажешь что ты там писал? А мы оценим

 

[hackeryaroslav]

У тебя хорошие статьи, из последнего что я читал. Не распинайся перед новорегом, у него скорее всего осеннее обострение или самоутверждается таким способом. Таких правильных нулей на одном месте крутить надо, одному новость модера не понравилась и он тут целую драму на весь форум раскрутил, другой статьи критикует ничего толкового не написав за свои 6 сообщений.

спасибо за поддержку, от там кстати пытался найти приглиат одной из моих последних статей, то выдал это:
#13 (Кушаем APT на завтрак — раскрываем все аспекты, векторы атак и многое другое) - Jul 27, 2024
---
/threads/119682/
Source: plurilock.com/deep-dive/advanced-persistent-threat-apt/
techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/advanced-persistent-threat-APT
PAYMENT REJECTED

я удивился мягко говоря, перешел и по ссылке и 404, заржал во все горло. Все равно, я уже все расписал, мне больше в принципе сказать нечего

 

[shrekushka]

hackeryaroslav, I see you already know the situation regarding your past articles but the outcome seems everything is good and growth.
Now even rand, I appreciate you supporting your friend but I am trying to make a rational point here that is independent of registration date. Let's assume your account was hacked and someone posted the exact same message from your account. Would that make more sense or less sense? Criticize the exact point I made, not based on my reputation. I will take the bullet then. But I understand the points. Of course, the Connor Mcgregor joke was lighthearted joke about my age, take it easy, bro. The joke sucks when I have to explain it or add warnings next to it) And some of the comments despite being harsh are just online blabber, this is a tradition of internet chats, boards from the 80s. And regarding my github pages, do you realize when it was released == late 2000s when Barack Obama was elected? And blogspot well is a dinosaur fossil. And regarding my contribution to the forum, it seems I have to write first, then criticize people who have already written or have a deposit. Like I explained clearly, I will write when there is time, convenience and most importantly inspiration, motivation in real life. Short messages discussing questions and answers is easy but a blog post without being shit is difficult, painful. I will write, but it might or might not be article in the coming days. I don't care if its an article or not, as long as I could share the info I wanted to or ask the questions I have doubts.

Regardless, hackeryaroslav, and rand, do you think its worthwhile to write about web, api and AI on damagelab? (AI attacks is a separate topic). The forum is not generic software engineering, same reason why we don't have topics of interest specifically like 'how to write a load balancer'. There is the clearnet there and other forums. The point is to keep DamageLab loaded and dense with topics on. That was the point. You can always write but if it falls into the topic of the forum, payment is worthy right?
And regarding standards, I am not one to talk about it. Generally consider this example, there are conference in your field of AI right, NEURIPS, ICML etc. The more prestigious the conference is, the more prestigious it gets over the years, the incoming paper volume increases during call for papers. But the standards increase as well. The acceptance rate can also decrease. This is same with universities. Now regarding the forum as well. You need to be thoughtful as in how much any forum can allocate to such article parts, besides other actual important parts of servers, ddos, data disks, future proofing etc.
The main trigger for me to start this debate was after reading that the admin had to pay out of pocket for the last article because of BTC bear.

я удивился мягко говоря, перешел и по ссылке и 404, заржал во все горло. Все равно, я уже все расписал, мне больше в принципе сказать нечего

Again, is this a mocking bro?) I read your previous message happily and understood your journey and now you are again mocking me after 2 messages?(
And why would I post fake information for a topic like this? purely for fun?
use the Wayback Machine
web.archive.org/web/20240303130153/https://plurilock.com/deep-dive/advanced-persistent-threat-apt/

I don't see a point in fighting. I messaged cleanly, rationally and am supportive. It's all good, bro) Happy writing.


Edit: admin, please you can move all this discussion to the threads/121208/ if it disturbs the current thread.

 

[hackeryaroslav]

Regardless, hackeryaroslav, and rand, do you think its worthwhile to write about web, api and AI on damagelab? (AI attacks is a separate topic). The forum is not generic software engineering, same reason why we don't have topics of interest specifically like 'how to write a load balancer'. There is the clearnet there and other forums. The point is to keep DamageLab loaded and dense with topics on. That was the point. You can always write but if it falls into the topic of the forum, payment is worthy right?

дамага не только место, где выкладывают комплексные 0-day ресерчи или статьи по обходу АВ, форум разносторонний. Мои статьи не имеют цели причинить вреда, все статьи тут показаны в образовательных целях. Если брать твою точку, то такие разделы как админство, криптовалюта, бизнес и инвестиции, медиа и другие не имеют смысла.

Again, is this a mocking bro?) I read your previous message happily and understood your journey and now you are again mocking me after 2 messages?(
And why would I post fake information for a topic like this? purely for fun?
use the Wayback Machine
web.archive.org/web/20240303130153/https://plurilock.com/deep-dive/advanced-persistent-threat-apt/

I don't see a point in fighting. I messaged cleanly, rationally and am supportive. It's all good, bro) Happy writing.

все, увидел. Если можешь назвать это статьей, то я нет. Вся информация которую я рассказываю публичная (я не рассказываю какие то скрытые методы создания и атак ИИ), кроме кода. Некоторые мысли оттуда конечно в косвенном виде отражаются, но прямым плагиатом, или даже близко не сказать. Уж тем более, я не иду на web.archive.org чтобы отыскать скрытые статьи. Она очень краткая и очень похожа на чатгпт. Больше добавить нечего

 

[DildoFagins]

Well, in my humble opinion, the general quality of the articles should be improved. The authors should prefer quality over quantity, but the way that rules for the pay out are currently set doesn't motivate authors to make better content. Because if you do prefer quality over quantity you would be payed less in the long run. I don't really know what we can do about it, not paying for the basic stuff may not be the best solution, as still there are some people that are new to our sphere of interest and they might enjoy basic articles and find it useful. Maybe admin could pay less for basic articles and more for deep and unique ones, but I don't know how we would differentiate one article from another. Someone would need to read through all of the articles to decide, and "ain't' nobody got time for that" (с).

However I think at very least we should be much more strict about articles that were written using ChatGPT, I was arguing about it with some authors that were posting shitty content with LLM's halucinated code. Feeding comunity with LLM generated halucinations and expecting to be payed for that is showing a huge disrespect to the community and (I think) it should result in a permanent ban.

 

[shrekushka]

Спойлер

"ain't' nobody got time for that"

However I think at very least we should be much more strict about articles that were written using ChatGPT, I was arguing about it with some authors that were posting shitty content with LLM's halucinated code. Feeding comunity with LLM generated halucinations and expecting to be payed for that is showing a huge disrespect to the community and (I think) it should result in a permanent ban.

I support a permanent ban with extreme prejudice when asked for a payment. But take my opinion with a grain of salt in the context of damage lab because all these years, I generally observed the culture on this forum from a distant silent vantage point until recently and I am slowly learning, its very interesting, so I might be biased, unfamiliar.

But regardless I believe it should be taken as seriously as the art, musics, creative forums take strict actions against AI generated content. Though the reason there is more nuanced because there AI isn't bad as in there is no concept of hallucination there in image, music generation etc. In fact the diffusion models generate art that has already passed Turing test for me and is in fact some of the most coolest beautiful art I've ever seen. The reason is 'subjectivity, creativity'. It's extremely disrespectful to the artists, musicians.

Only in text with these large language models, there is objectiveness that can be definitively proved without waging wars. Of course poetry, prose, drama, other literature, etc are exceptions that still retain subjectivity but otherwise, no.

And regarding articles, the quality is crap. I don't know how well it is in Russian, but English itself is crap. The best word I can come up is 'generic'. If LLM's English proficiency is crap, Russian must be awful unless the person generates English and translates himself.

The writers somehow think that people are stupid in evaluating if the content is from AI or not. Our neural networks are far ahead of any GPT. And regarding code itself, it's not so difficult to classify if it was vomited by GPT.
And again, it is extremely disrespectful.

In the future, I will predict that this will become some kind of taboo in some amount of population at least to use AI content in anyway or even interact with AI systems that imitate human ingenuity, creativity.

CNET pauses publishing AI-written stories after disclosure controversy

Other Red Ventures sites will also pause the use of AI writing tools.

www.theverge.com

BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Whole AI-Generated Articles, Not Just Quizzes

After announcing earlier this year a pivot to quizzes co-written by AI, BuzzFeed seems to have widened its purview to include articles.

futurism.com

Edit:

not paying for the basic stuff may not be the best solution

I generally agree with this too. Sometimes there is a need for re-explanation, rewriting of topics found on clearnet already. But need to contrast this from the
obvious crap like a flask routines, nginx setups etc. Same shit can't be repeated. We can't enter 2025 and still write how to talk to ChatGPT from terminal, how to perform your first SQLi. Of course, clear explanations, things that are not already popular/clear, case studies, real world pratical examples etc are always interesting. For example, a brand new guide for proxmox OPSEC, BIND zone files setup with new features etc. Of course, even if some information is found on the clearnet already, if the author addresses it uniquely or more clearly or practical examples (I don't know how to define it other than using intuition), can get paid. Something like this.
And more importantly on the topic, not just software in general. For example, web administration is a broad field but it has overlaps in the field of hacking. The overall idea is to write in the theme.

Sorry, I have repeated myself too much today. Bye. There is lot of work(

The topic will die once the talk stops or if I just talk and offer no solution and again 10 articles on how to hack AI or setup nginx pop up stealing 1000$ from the forum.

I have an idea, tell me what you think or throw tomatoes. Let's analyze from first principles.

The main goal for the article payment is to incentivize people to write interesting, useful content. Now what is interesting/userful? Some form of comment, appreciation, review, feedback can be a potential signal (of course there are false positives: multiple accounts, friends, fans etc), that people care. Likes are meaningless and show no effort on the reader/reviewer side. I see people liking all posts in the Exploitation section, but rarely comment at least something. What for? To look cool? "I read every USENIX paper on ChakraCore and studied the new fuzzer"?. Of course, like is simple and has its own reasons. But the point is, if there was some kind of talk/discussion generated around the topic and some kind of reviews/comments from acceptable people in some form of way. Let's say at least 3 people. Now how do you define such 3 people or 3 'quality' reviews, discussion is next step and how do you define quality? New registration doesn't matter? Fake accounts?. But something in this direction seems good I think.

In essence the idea is somewhat analogous to proof of work. Proof of work on the reader's side who this is aimed at that it was genuinely useful, interesting ~ worthy of payment. And on topic. Now this is asynchronous, if you write a blogpost today, you can paid 20 days later if the reviews arise then.

admin

 

[varwar]

I see people liking all posts in the Exploitation section, but rarely comment at least something. What for? To look cool?

Cause there are no one who know every aspects of exploitation. Also we still don't have a critical mass of vulnerability researchers or system programmers for such wide discussions. Me personally can discuss Windows kernel exploitation to the best of my knowledge. But if I see that author wrote a good edited article I will like it, cause he spent time to share it. This is the least I can do. Maybe in five years the situation will change and more capable VR people appear here.

shrekushka Furthermore, it's not the only our forum problem. A lot of Discord VR-related channels are dead.

 

[shrekushka]

Cause there are no one who know every aspects of exploitation. Also we still don't have a critical mass of vulnerability researchers or system programmers for such wide discussions. Me personally can discuss Windows kernel exploitation to the best of my knowledge. But if I see that author wrote a good edited article I will like it, cause he spent time to share it. This is the least I can do. Maybe in five years the situation will change and more capable VR people appear here.

Yes, I know. I am trying to popularize this paradigm:
Use the bookmark for all the cool topics you want to study now or later. Like one by one after you've studied them. This way there's some kind of personal gamification, and giving meaning to likes ergo articles ergo authors/translators/linkers (linker lol).
I strictly forbid myself to not like topics that I haven't studied clearly yet. For example, there was recent phrack article, weaver posted it there. I first bookmarked it and then read and dropped the like. After dropping the like, it felt like I genuinely appreciated. Now if there's patience and most importantly motivation, inspiration I will write a small discussion in the section. The idea is that people can use to display some sort of genuine interest.

And regarding, thanking authors, yes I agree. There are lots of cool articles, references on the forum, that I will never study, for example: once I tried dabbling into v8 internals, i built the engine and studied the source, conference articles for a few weeks and it turned out there was no interest at the end. Dread Pirate Roberts, gliderexpert have some interesting stuff which I probably will never study, but the work undoubtedly deserves more than a like.

I repeat myself but yes I understand your point. I myself feel tempted to put a like sometimes.

And regarding the actual topic. Still no solution is being offered. Some kind of proof of work from readers' side is required, work == genuine interest, usefulness, coolness etc. If you found the article useful, interesting and want the author to get paid, then write a review with some sweat.
Youtube has a proof of work model: viewers watch ads for N seconds and even click, conversion rates, which is essentially work.
Like I said, the only thing that is constant is perhaps the cycle or new complaints about articles quality, few threads of complaining and silence and few more article hucksters, 1000$ stolen, article competition has a hole in the wallet, admin burns his personal money and so on.

Edit:
I've decided:

Fuck this, there's no solution I can come up with. Perhaps the only solution is to criticize all "мелочь из карманов тырить" article peddlers (Whisper, did I use it right?) with extreme prejudice whenever they drop their APT level shit whenever I read one or anyone reads one. This is the only solution.
Focus on the actual shit: forums/145
Fuck it
Close the thread.

 

[china666]

это все понятно, хакера посты где можно почитать?

 

[handersen]

хакера посты

Начни отсюда: /threads/17102/, и поиск по названию статьи, т. к. некоторые выкладываются в тематических разделах, например /threads/120892/.
Вот еще человек свежую версию книги Фундаментальные основы хакерства выложил: /threads/83161/post-850575.

 

[n0_mad]

"Эго" помноженное на "интеллект" даёт множество букв с бесполезными аллегориями, ответвлениями, локальными шутками, с попытками в сарказм и витьеватыми выражениями своих мыслей, которого даже чересчур. Зачем каждый раз в разделах открывать темы и ныть, пытаясь дискредитировать авторов? Хочется лучше сделать - предложи как, а не прикладывай миллион усилий в попытках прикрыть личную неприязнь и непрофессионализм "благими намерениями". Типа "Рыцарь форума", на страже денег админа и полезности контента.

 

[shrekushka]

"Эго" помноженное на "интеллект" даёт множество букв с бесполезными аллегориями, ответвлениями, локальными шутками, с попытками в сарказм и витьеватыми выражениями своих мыслей, которого даже чересчур. Зачем каждый раз в разделах открывать темы и ныть, пытаясь дискредитировать авторов? Хочется лучше сделать - предложи как, а не прикладывай миллион усилий в попытках прикрыть личную неприязнь и непрофессионализм "благими намерениями". Типа "Рыцарь форума", на страже денег админа и полезности контента.

No one's complaining than the people who's articles got rejected a payday or those who plan on exploiting this vulnerability one day. What's your problem? Rejected as well?
What's the problem here? Your only wish is to make money writing? Is it so hard to not live without writing for money?

PS. If you primarily want to make money, put up a service in the commercial section. When you write something interesting (not for beginners, copy-paste, water, reference books etc) and under the theme of the forum, perhaps you could apply for the payment from the admin. This shouldn't be your primary predatory source of money.

PPS. You don't get paid for spending hours in writing. That's not how the market works.

PPPS. Writing "articles" should not be your primary source of money. It's an incentivizing program from the forum's side and to support authors in the process. Read https://habr.com/en/sandbox/start/

PPPPS. Constructive criticism is exactly what I offered in the beginning if you read my messages. Have you read them? Once the people started defending their piece of work in technically irrational, stupid and out of their common sense ways, I started a more aggressive campaign. Look at my first posts. I wrote about the exact problem for each person/article. Show me where I didn't underline the exact technical problem and I will buy a Premium subscription for someone we both could agree on, n0_mad. Get your facts right before you come at others.

Типа "Рыцарь форума", на страже денег админа и полезности контента.

I am willing to serve unoficially.

Trump Suggests He Would Give Elon Musk A Cabinet Position

Former President Donald Trump told Reuters on Monday he would be interested in giving Tesla CEO Elon Musk a spot in the White House if Musk is open to it.

www.forbes.com

 

[shrekushka]

http://xss.pro/threads/123503/

Let's take apart this wannabe “article” bit by bit, because if you’re going to demand payment from the admin, you better bring something better than a hack job of buzzwords and shit code.
The beginning part reads like a copy-paste job straight from product brochures. SAS uses machine learning? And FICO does network analysis? Cool.
You’ve given us something no better than a ChatGPT summary.

Your py3 examples are a tragedy.
1st method: Simple anomaly detection:
First off, congratulations on writing a basic pandas script that a 1 hour data science bootcamp/crash course student could pump out in their sleep. Seriously, filtering transactions based on amount and time of day?
Then you append transactions less than 100 as suspicious. This is what happens on the first day. You know nothing.

2nd method: Clustering:
K-means for fraud detection? You threw in K-means because it’s what everyone Googles first or the LLM perhaps came up with that crap. This is basic ML (day 1) crap
Your one-hot encoding is sloppy. Instead of talking about the importance of feature engineering or how categorical encoding impacts clustering, you gloss over the subject like it's an afterthought.
So this “sophisticated” technique involves plotting transaction amounts on the x-axis and showing the cluster on the y-axis? What a joke.

3rd: Link analysis
Congratulations, you can generate a basic graph with NetworkX and calculate degree centrality. This is the == "2+2=4". This is the most basic shit.

Shit. Crap. Disrespectful. Scammer. You consider the readers to be cognitively disabled?

rand just tell n0_mad what you genuinely think of his article? He intentionally tried to pass it off to the admin for a payment. Some kind of crap probably with the help of an LLM (or out of his own brain, doesn't matter)
Is it worth protecting intentional scammers like this? At least hackeryaroslav 's recent articles were technically correct, help js framework enthusiasts (my criticism was the theme, some other forum would probably pay for him but not this).

n0_mad what's your face now in front of the admin and the entire forum? The internet eliminates shame?

PS. n0_mad is that constructive enough? Scammer!

PPS. I didn't even go into the "financial fraud analysis using AGI" theme of the article which itself is a bunch of crappy buzzwords cobbled together. And not under the theme of the forum.

 

[n0_mad]

http://xss.pro/threads/123503/

Let's take apart this wannabe “article” bit by bit, because if you’re going to demand payment from the admin, you better bring something better than a hack job of buzzwords and shit code.
The beginning part reads like a copy-paste job straight from product brochures. SAS uses machine learning? And FICO does network analysis? Cool.
You’ve given us something no better than a ChatGPT summary.

Your py3 examples are a tragedy.
1st method: Simple anomaly detection:
First off, congratulations on writing a basic pandas script that a 1 hour data science bootcamp/crash course student could pump out in their sleep. Seriously, filtering transactions based on amount and time of day?
Then you append transactions less than 100 as suspicious. This is what happens on the first day. You know nothing.

2nd method: Clustering:
K-means for fraud detection? You threw in K-means because it’s what everyone Googles first or the LLM perhaps came up with that crap. This is basic ML (day 1) crap
Your one-hot encoding is sloppy. Instead of talking about the importance of feature engineering or how categorical encoding impacts clustering, you gloss over the subject like it's an afterthought.
So this “sophisticated” technique involves plotting transaction amounts on the x-axis and showing the cluster on the y-axis? What a joke.

3rd: Link analysis
Congratulations, you can generate a basic graph with NetworkX and calculate degree centrality. This is the == "2+2=4". This is the most basic shit.

Shit. Crap. Disrespectful. Scammer. You consider the readers to be cognitively disabled?

rand just tell n0_mad what you genuinely think of his article? He intentionally tried to pass it off to the admin for a payment. Some kind of crap probably with the help of an LLM (or out of his own brain, doesn't matter)
Is it worth protecting intentional scammers like this? At least hackeryaroslav 's recent articles were technically correct, help js framework enthusiasts (my criticism was the theme, some other forum would probably pay for him but not this).

n0_mad what's your face now in front of the admin and the entire forum? The internet eliminates shame?

PS. n0_mad is that constructive enough? Scammer!

PPS. I didn't even go into the "financial fraud analysis using AGI" theme of the article which itself is a bunch of crappy buzzwords cobbled together. And not under the theme of the forum.

Bla-bla-bla. Lots of pointless words (that I don't even care to read) to prove and do nothing. Yanks have usual issues with thinking that there is a need to spread their own opinion everywhere and that it's always right. Funny enough, that if you take all the bollocks you have wrote and compose - you could make an article worth paying for in terms of symbols. But, unfortunately or luckily, you have no expertise. Only you can do - blame, search and say that all are scammers that use AI. Come on, man up, mate. Make something worthy rather than just pooping out all of the above.

 

[shrekushka]

Спойлер: del

Bla-bla-bla. Lots of pointless words (that I don't even care to read) to prove and do nothing. Yanks have usual issues with thinking that there is a need to spread their own opinion everywhere and that it's always right. Funny enough, that if you take all the bollocks you have wrote and compose - you could make an article worth paying for in terms of symbols. But, unfortunately or luckily, you have no expertise. Only you can do - blame, search and say that all are scammers that use AI. Come on, man up, mate. Make something worthy rather than just pooping out all of the above.

I don't mind writing no articles if you that's what you want.
admin, ban this scammer (maybe it's out of my personal spite perhaps but repetition should in fact result in a ban). Do you have a technical rebuttal? Using K-Means?
Your senility has been exposed.

PS. Debate with me (technically). And if you win, I will gift a person we both agree on, a Premium Subscription. Or are you scared? n0_mad